![]() ![]() ![]() |

Flat | Previous Topic | Next Topic |
Poster | Thread |
---|---|
johannes | Posted on: 2011/10/9 1:45 |
Just popping in ![]() ![]() Joined: 2011/10/9 From: Posts: 4 |
Deployment Diagram needs minor improvement Hi,
I'm trying to use the Deployment Diagram to model server clusters. My difficulty is that the the server cluster is in active-passive mode and therefore, a grouping element is required. In a simple 2 node-cluster, I would model 2 Node instances. To denote the active-passive cluster, I would have to do either of the following: 1) draw a group/ boundary around the 2 node instances 2) use another (composite) node instance to contain the 2 node instances Using the former poses issues as the group/ boundary element cannot be used to realize or depend on interfaces ![]() The more correct way is to use the latter where the composite node will be able to realize or depend on interfaces. However node-in-node isn't supported in Astah ![]() Anyone has any better suggestions? Or should this be a feature request? Thanks! |
Flat | Previous Topic | Next Topic |
Subject | Poster | Date |
---|---|---|
» ![]() |
johannes | 2011/10/9 1:45 |
![]() |
Joba | 2011/10/11 13:38 |
![]() |
johannes | 2011/10/12 0:53 |
