![]() ![]() ![]() |
Threaded | Oldest First | Previous Topic | Next Topic | Bottom |
Poster | Thread |
---|---|
Joba | Posted on: 2006/8/25 10:25 |
Developer ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/6/6 From: Posts: 969 |
Re: Is this a bug? Hello YXB,
Thank you for your post! We consider that it is not a bug. If you change the Multiplicity setting of the Role to * or others, it will be "Class1[]". Thank you very much for your suggestion! ![]() We love to consider implementing this feature in a future release. Although the time when it will support is not specified yet at the moment. ![]() |
Anonymous | Posted on: 2006/8/24 17:16 |
Is this a bug? Post from YXB as a guest
--- There is a aggregate association between two classes(Class0 & Class1). java file was exported as follow:
But the correct result should be:
I get the wrong result with jude community 3.0.2(model version: 22) I download today. The correct result was gotten with jude community 2.4.4 I suggested that roles of aggregate association can be set a container use to contain associated objects.(IBM rational rose has already supported) |
|
Threaded | Oldest First | Previous Topic | Next Topic | Top |