Main Menu
Login
SSL SecureMode
Username:
Password:  
Lost Password?
Register now!
ChangeVision Members Map
Search
Forum Index   -   Topic Index
   How to use of Astah (Pro/SysML/GSN/Com)
     Packages vs. Subsystems

Flat Previous Topic | Next Topic
Poster Thread
Joba
Posted on: 2006/8/17 14:28
Developer
Joined: 2006/6/6
From:
Posts: 969
Re: Packages vs. Subsystems
Hello again dserodio,

JUDE completely understands Subsystems as the quoto you pasted at your first post.

There is a presentation option for Subsystem notation.
Quote:
The fork symbol may be replaced by the keyword <<subsystem>> placed above the name of the subsystem.
From "OMG Unified Modeling Language Specification March 2003 Version 1.5 formal/03-03-01 :
3-14-3, Subsystem-Presentation Options" http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/03-03-01.pdf

So technically by adding the <<subsystem>> stereotype to a package, it transforms into a Subsystem like you mentioned but there will be no "pitchfork" icon shown in the notation when you do it. It is because that JUDE does not support the notation feature to change "Package notation" into "Subsystem notation" with pitchfork when adding <<subsystem>> stereotype to it. And like the presentation option says "the pitchfork symbol can be replaced by the keyword <<subsystem>> placed in a large rectangle".
Flat Previous Topic | Next Topic

Subject Poster Date
   Packages vs. Subsystems dserodio 2006/8/10 0:45
     Re: Packages vs. Subsystems Joba 2006/8/10 10:50
       Re: Packages vs. Subsystems dserodio 2006/8/16 23:06
       » Re: Packages vs. Subsystems Joba 2006/8/17 14:28
           Re: Packages vs. Subsystems dserodio 2006/8/19 2:09
             Re: Packages vs. Subsystems Joba 2006/8/21 12:28